The 2026 Constitutional Amendments

November 3, 2026 · statewide ballot

Just vote No.

Three constitutional amendments are on your ballot this fall. On all three, our recommendation is the same: vote No.

Q1 Partial vetoQ2 Worship in emergenciesQ3 “Preferential treatment”

How an amendment gets on your ballot

A constitutional amendment does not become law the way an ordinary bill does. In Wisconsin it follows a separate three-step path, and one step is missing on purpose.

1

Pass the Legislature twice

The same amendment, in identical wording, must be approved by the Legislature in two consecutive sessions.

2

Skip the Governor

Unlike a normal bill, it is never sent to the Governor for a signature and it cannot be vetoed. This is the step that lets the majority go around Gov. Evers.

3

Voters decide

It goes to a statewide referendum. A simple majority of the people who vote on the question is enough to change the constitution.

Because there is no minimum turnout and no supermajority requirement, a low-turnout election can write a lasting change into the state constitution, and undoing it later takes the same long two-session-plus-referendum process. That is why what is on the ballot this fall deserves a close read. (Source: Wisconsin Constitution, Article XII.)

All three were placed on the ballot by the Republican legislative majority, with no bipartisan support. The amendment process is how they put their priorities in front of voters without Gov. Evers’ signature, so it cannot be vetoed. When a change to our state constitution is one-party, has no bipartisan buy-in, and is routed around the Governor precisely because he would veto it, that is the tell.The process itself is the reason to be skeptical. Read each one, then vote No.
Q1
Question 1 · Senate Joint Resolution 116
Restricting the partial veto
Vote No
On your ballot
“Partial veto. Shall section 10 (1) (c) of article V of the constitution be amended to prohibit the governor, in exercising his or her partial veto authority, from creating or increasing or authorizing the creation or increase of any tax or fee?”

What it really does

Wisconsin’s governor has an unusually broad line-item (partial) veto. This would carve taxes and fees out of that power. It is a direct response to Gov. Evers’ 2023 partial veto that extended a school revenue-limit increase (the widely reported “400-year” veto).

Why vote No

A policy disagreement over school funding should be settled through the normal legislative process, not by permanently rewriting the constitution to hobble one office after a single veto the majority disliked. Locking a budget tactic into the constitution is the wrong tool for a spending fight.

Who is behind it
  • Americans for Prosperity
  • MacIver Impact
  • National Federation of Independent Business
  • Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
  • Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
  • Wisconsin Property Taxpayers
  • Wisconsin Realtors Association
Who opposes it
  • League of Women Voters of Wisconsin
  • Wisconsin Education Association Council
Q2
Question 2 · Assembly Joint Resolution 10
Blocking public-health orders for worship
Vote No
On your ballot
“Freedom to gather in places of worship during an emergency. Shall section 18 of article I of the constitution, which deals with religious liberty, be amended to prohibit the state or a political subdivision of the state from ordering the closure of, or forbidding gatherings in, places of worship in response to a state of emergency, including a public health emergency?”

What it really does

It would bar state and local government from closing, or limiting gatherings at, places of worship during any emergency, including a public health emergency. It grew out of the COVID-19 orders that restricted large gatherings. To be fair: it does not force any congregation to stay open. Each place of worship still decides for itself how to operate.

Why vote No

It removes a public-health tool during a genuine emergency and singles out one category of gathering for a permanent constitutional exemption. How to respond to the next public-health crisis should weigh the facts on the ground, not be decided in advance by the constitution.

Who is behind it
  • Pro-Life Wisconsin
  • Wisconsin Family Action
Who opposes it
  • League of Women Voters of Wisconsin
Q3
Question 3 · Assembly Joint Resolution 102
An untested “preferential treatment” ban
Vote No
On your ballot
“Governmental entity discrimination prohibited. Shall section 27 of article I of the constitution be created to prohibit governmental entities in the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, public contracting, or public administration?”

What it really does

Government discrimination is already illegal in Wisconsin and nationwide. The new language here is “preferential treatment,” a phrase with no settled meaning that invites lawsuits. It would also bind any private, for-profit, or nonprofit group that contracts with government or uses public facilities.

Why vote No

It duplicates anti-discrimination protections we already have while adding a vague standard that could sweep in programs people rely on: Head Start, maternal and infant health programs, support for minority-owned businesses, language interpreters, and school curricula. Sweeping, open-ended text belongs in statute, if anywhere, not the constitution.

Who is behind it
  • Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
Who opposes it
  • American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin
  • League of Women Voters of Wisconsin
12

Counting these three, Wisconsin Republicans have put 12 proposed constitutional amendments in front of voters since 2020. Voters have already rejected two of them. This process has become a routine end-run around the normal way we make law.

Sources

Ballot questions and origin. Q1 = Senate Joint Resolution 116; Q2 = Assembly Joint Resolution 10; Q3 = Assembly Joint Resolution 102 (Wisconsin Legislature, SJR 116, AJR 10, AJR 102). Overview and history: Ballotpedia, Wisconsin 2026 ballot measures; Wisconsin Public Radio.
Q1 partial veto. Ties to Gov. Evers’ 2023 school revenue-limit partial veto (widely reported). Q3 preferential treatment. Ballotpedia amendment page.
Amendment count since 2020. Seven amendments approved and two rejected have already been decided; with these three pending, that is 12 proposed since 2020 (Ballotpedia).
Supporters, opponents, and further reading. League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Constitutional Corner.

Make a plan to vote No, then bring a friend.

Check your registration and find your polling place at MyVote Wisconsin, and see everything else on your ballot.

Check your registrationFind your racesFind your polling place